Indiana Right to Life Gets It
The Indiana Right to Life Political Action Committee announced this week that they have adopted a resolution denying endorsements to all Democrat candidates for office. The move is an expansion on an existing policy to refuse endorsements to Democrats running for the Indiana House of Representatives.
“Our leadership anguished over this decision,” notes IRTL-PAC chairman Mike Fichter. “Had Democrats like Brad Ellsworth held firm in opposing federal funding for abortion in the health care bill, we likely would have rewarded such action with a bipartisan endorsement policy. Ellsworth’s collapse under pressure from the White House and Speaker Pelosi, as well as the collapse of his colleagues Joe Donnelly and Baron Hill, leaves us with no alternative. Leadership matters, and the reality is that Democratic leaders are advancing an abortion agenda at an alarming rate that will only be checked by a Republican majority.” — CNW
For years, moderate Democrat candidates for the state legislature have been able to hang on in conservative districts because they have stuck to the pro-life talking points, using their Indiana Right to Life endorsement as a shield against GOP efforts to take back the majority. Even though IRL was offering meaningful support to Democrats who needed it, their agenda was routinely flushed by House Democrat leadership year in and year out. By 2008, IRL was tired of Democrats sandbagging their priorities and refused to endorse Democrat candidates for the Indiana House.
After being burned by “moderate” Democrat Congressmen who caved in to their party leadership during the recent debate over abortion funding in health care reform legislation, IRL has apparently decided that they have had just about enough of Democrats in Congress talking one way in the district and voting the other way in Washington. The move shows political courage and I wish more organizations that exist to advocate for their core beliefs would follow IRL’s lead.




Powered by
Clearly they DON’T get it. There is no abortion funding in the recently passed health care legislation.
It’s a shame since many Pro-life advocates are single issue voters. IF IRL will only endorse Republicans, IRL voters will not have a choice on other issues where they might not agree with Republicans.
[...] but in recent years many pro-life Democrats have been going the way of Harry Reid. As one blogger put it "IRL has apparently decided that they have had just about enough of Democrats in Congress talking [...]
[...] but in recent years many pro-life Democrats have been going the way of Harry Reid. As one blogger put it “IRL has apparently decided that they have had just about enough of Democrats in Congress [...]
[...] Right to Life PAC just announced that they are now barring the endorsement of Democratic candidates. “Our leadership anguished [...]
[...] Right to Life PAC just announced that they are now barring the endorsement of Democratic candidates. “Our leadership anguished [...]
[...] Right to Life PAC just announced that they are now barring the endorsement of Democratic candidates. “Our leadership anguished [...]
Bill wrote: “Clearly they DON’T get it. There is no abortion funding in the recently passed health care legislation.” So, Bill, why do you think Obama signed a meaningless executive order that cannot be enforced preventing the funding of abortions? If you believe that tax dollars will not be used to fund abortions then you are a fool. Of course they will. The baby killers in Washington would have it no other way. And if it means they have to tweak the legislation later to get it done, they will. Get you head out of the sand, Bill.
What is the point of moderating comments if you’re going to allow personal attacks to be posted? Can’t we stick to the issue?
Point me to the section of the Bill authorizing public funds for abortion. I’ve looked for it, and I can’t find it.